Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Red Alert: Avens Publishing Group by Pedro Guimarães

$
0
0

Yes,
“There is an inherent bias towards (an address in) developing and underdeveloped countries, which are perceived to be of low standard and of poor quality”;
but no,
“This bias itself precludes a level playing field and a fair competition based only on merit”.

As Jeffrey mentioned above ““Leveling the playing field” is not a justification for lying or hiding information from people”.

First, most articles in these open-access, low standard journals, come from developing and underdeveloped countries. Just because these countries need a place to increment the curricula of its academics. There’s no reason to lie just to attract american or european articles. This is nonsense. They are trying to attract dishonest or ingenuous people.

There is a large number of honest journals based on developing and underdeveloped countries, with the purpose of publishing research of regional relevance. Some of them eventually receive an impact factor. In these cases, a large number of papers coming from other regions of the world are submitted … without lies or hidden information.

This is the case of Scielo-based journals (Latin American, mostly brazilian jounals) or Research4Life (Hinari etc) journals.


Comment on Have I Discovered the Source of the Hijacked Journals? by Manikandan Harikrishnan

$
0
0

Friends
1. La pensee ( http://www.penseejournal.com )
2. Mitteilungen Klosterneuberg (http://mitt-klosterneuburg.com)
are original or fake. kindly confirm this. if they are fake kindly provide me the original web id of them so.
And why the originals not identifying the doublicates and they are not taking any actions against them and to stop them, despite they have the same issn number. it is affecting all the researchscholars. Kindly we people take some necessary actions on this. it will help the others.

Comment on Have I Discovered the Source of the Hijacked Journals? by Manikandan Harikrishnan

$
0
0

Ya sir, i have paid for this journal. But we need to take some severe actions against them. through the original one.

Comment on Red Alert: Avens Publishing Group by Sudesh Kumar

$
0
0

Your above comments reflect exactly what I am saying.

I also agree that there is no justification for lying or hiding information, but is the “country of original” such an important criteria that anyone not disclosing it must be branded “predatory”? It has absolutely no relation to the publishing practices. “Publishing” plagiarized content – bad; “Publishing” low quality content – bad; “No” peer review – bad; “No” editorial review – bad; BUT Country of Origin?

You said “…most articles in these open-access, low standard journals come from developing and underdeveloped countries”,

So you also think that developing and underdeveloped countries publish low quality, low standard journals? How did you know that the journals are of low standard? Have you published in any such journal and observed its practices or your observation based only on – the address?

People from underdeveloped and developing countries do not publish articles – “Just because these countries need a place to increment the curricula of its academics.” – Very wrong statement, and it is true for every country.

“honest journals based on developing and underdeveloped countries, with the purpose of publishing research of regional relevance.” – So journal from developing and underdeveloped countries should publish research of regional significance.

Does a journals from developing or an underdeveloped country no right to be GLOBAL? Do you really think that PLOS or Biomed Central would have been this successful if they had been started from Mongolia or Indian or Sri Lanka.

Bottom line is – bias exists; processes never get a chance to be matter, and even if they do it is at a regional level – everything that matters is the – country or the address.

Comment on Red Alert: Avens Publishing Group by Sudesh Kumar

$
0
0

My apologies for some language errors in the previous comments.

Comment on Red Alert: Avens Publishing Group by Muhammad

Comment on Another Award Scam? The International Research Promotion Council by Samir Hachani

$
0
0

I have not yet received anything but if they send me such a message , I would know they are right !!!!!

Comment on Red Alert: Avens Publishing Group by AlexH

$
0
0

I’ve never heard about authors makig decisions based on the country of origin of the journal’s editorial office. I would say that it is hardly a factor in any professional decision. What really counts is abstracting/indexing, reputation of the editorial board, quality of the published articles and adequacy of topic.

The lack of western names on the editorial board and/or among the authors of past issues can raise a flag for some (including myself), but it will not make a difference if the journal publishes quality work.

These publishers are not lying to attract articles from western authors. Their targets are dishonest or inexperienced authors, westerners or not. Money is money. An inexperienced author will not be influenced by the country of origin of the editorial office; it is overal a very small and unimportant detail and they are often unaware even about the important ones (and this is why they are mistaken in considering predatory journals as a possible place for publication). A dishonet author, however, may think that a phony journal looks more legit (meaning it is harder to discover its phoniness by collegues or administrators) if dressed in western garments.


Comment on Red Alert: Avens Publishing Group by Sudesh Kumar

$
0
0

So a lack of western editors makes a journal suspect. I take this to mean that presence of western names on the editorial board provides a “more” legitimacy to the journals. I wonder why?

How many westerners would serve on the editorial boards of journals from lets say Peru, Bolivia, Thialand, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Morocco and many more.

If this is so, the journals from underdeveloped and developing countries with no western names are suspect, until an author makes a decision based on the quality of work, which the authors in many cases, especially first or second timers can not. If an author is incapable of judging the quality, and the journal has no western names where does it leave the journal? – with no submissions I guess.

I absolutely don’t agree with – “These publishers are not lying to attract articles from western authors. Their targets are dishonest or inexperienced authors”.

Do you think that some publisher would have said – there are many dishonest and inexperienced authors in the world so we will give a western address so that we can cheat them for money? Hardly any publisher would have started publishing to “target” dishonest and inexperienced authors for money. In my opinion publisher probably think that publishing journals are a way to earn money and they start journals. Then they give a “western address” to attract more papers in general, from everyone – not from westerners authors, not from inexperienced authors, not from dishonest authors, because believe it or not an address in US is undoubtedly more attractive than an address in Mongolia. Of course the “dishonest authors” may use these journal to publish papers, but won’t that make the author guilty and not the publisher?

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2013 by La Sindone avvolgeva l’esplosivo, cont. – Ocasapiens - Blog - Repubblica.it

$
0
0

[…] A Padova Oggi, narra di esser stato finanziato con 54 mila euro dal proprio ateneo, di aver scoperto con la datazione “meccanica” – incertezza +/-400 anni – che il telo “è coevo all’uomo” che avvolgeva – e di aver pubblicato il risultato su riviste scientifiche di livello internazionale. Il prof. Fanti dice le bugie. Con i soldi nostri, tre anni fa si è comprato due articoli da un editore per pataccari. […]

Comment on Red Alert: Avens Publishing Group by Sudesh Kumar

$
0
0

Right.

First I am very confident about myself, but I can not remove the bias that exists in this world, and you can not deny that it exists.

Second, before making statements like — ” Look at Hindawi, it is not a US/European company. However, their profit is bigger than Elsevier”, — CHECK your facts. Hindawi’s revenue was 6 million in 2011 and for Elsevier it was about 800 million in 2011. I know the source of your information and that article was written exactly to give the impression that you have. Please go and read it again.

Third – “Even Mr Beall does not put Hindawi on his list.” — if you check again, Hindawi was on Beall’s list but it was removed due to undisclosed reasons, and I would love to know why it was removed.

As your primary requirement for submitting and article is “as long as the journal is listed in Scopus or Pubmed” I would like to mention that before the journal can be listed in Scopus or Pubmed it needs to have articles published, and to get publications it needs authors and if authors like yourself will submit articles to only journal can be listed in Scopus or Pubmed, no new journal will ever get started.

Here is an interesting article i would like to share: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1866196/

Comment on Yet Another OMICS Publishing Group Blunder by Nils

$
0
0

I can understand the authors are unhappy with the inept typesetting of the unauthorized publication. Apart from the name issue, a whole set of problems hurt the eye, that could have been avoided with an appropriate typesetting software such as LaTeX:

- Hyphen errors such as “discussed in de- tail below.”
- Missing spaces as in “examined.In particular,”
- Wrong equation numbering: (3a) appears twice and there are references to missing equation (4).
- No consistency in mathematical mode: Displays use different fonts as mathematical symbols in the text, and sizes do not match; indices are sometimes italicized and sometimes not (as they should); the placement of indices is awkard and sizes are not consistent.
- Quotation marks are not used consistently.
- Accents are missing in the references, e.g. Csiszar I.
- In addition, every basic typesetting manual will tell you that mixing fonts with and without serifs is not considered the best of practices.

Comment on A list of Print-on-demand publishers, self-publishing/”Vanity presses” and other non-traditional publishers for librarians and authors by liza2408

$
0
0

Hi Jeffrey, I follow every bit of activity on your website and appreciate the service you provide.

I just got a call for papers from The Academic Forum which publishes The Exchange, and academic journal containing papers only if presented at their conferences. They seem to have appeared in 2011 and now have about 5 conferences a year. The head is Dr. Richard A.L. Caldarola, *Troy University* – Conference Chair, Editor and Publisher. Given the things you look for — and now I look for — do you think this is legitimate?

thanks,

Comment on A list of Print-on-demand publishers, self-publishing/”Vanity presses” and other non-traditional publishers for librarians and authors by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

I can’t tell you whether it is legitimate. I can only say that I don’t think it meets the criteria for being classed as a predatory publisher.

If you disagree and think it does qualify as a predatory publisher, by all means, please let me know why — perhaps I missed something. Thanks.

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

Mitch:
I added this publisher to my list last week. I think it is extremely questionable, and I advise scholars to avoid it.

I am wondering if it is connected to the publisher JSciMedCentral in any way — the “J” in the logo matches on both publishers’ websites.

But perhaps this new questionable publisher just stole the logo from the older predatory publisher.

Thanks,

Jeffrey Beall


Comment on Red Alert: Avens Publishing Group by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

The reason I was asking to see his CV is because I suspect he is using a fake name.

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Deepak

$
0
0

Poetic justice, when one predator poaches the logo of another!

Comment on A Publisher with no Website: Science and Engineering Publishing Company by Steve Shore

$
0
0

They’re still at it, scavenging the real journals for potential contributors with promises of free publication if a paper is submitted before a specified date (I just got a solicitation and thought it could be a useful reminder and warning, students have asked about this too). Keep up the fine, necessary work

Comment on A Publisher with no Website: Science and Engineering Publishing Company by Steve Shore

$
0
0

As a follow-up comment, this is from their website (the journal that sent the solicitation, Research and Applications in Astronomy, doesn’t even list an editor-in-chief and there are no online issues; the ISSN are listed as TBD):

“All papers submitted to our journals go through a rigorous review process. They are refereed by experts in said field before publication. There exist four possible outcomes for each paper submitted and reviewed: acceptance, acceptance after minor revision, major revision and re-submission, or rejection. This prevents the promulgation of pseudoscience and insures intellectual and scientific integrity of the findings published by SEP.
The Editor-in-Chief is the first to see an author’s work. They are to forward the paper to experts in the specific field discussed in the paper for review. After review, the Editor-in-Chief of the journal will look over the reviewer’s comments. If two reviewers seem to hold opposite opinions of the same paper, the controversy will be resolved by the Editor-in-Chief. Ultimately, the Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision. The final decision is being one of the aforementioned possibilities: acceptance, acceptance with noted changes, or rejection of paper.”

Comment on Introduction to “Super Closed Access Journals” by Lucyna Kornecki

$
0
0

Dear Michael Brown,
Thank you very much for your interest in US foreign direct investment (FDI) financial structure. I do definitely agree that there are similarities in the 3 papers published recently: World Review of Business Research Inward U.S. Foreign Direct Investment Performance During Recent Financial Crises (1) and International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance & Economic Sciences Outward U.S. Foreign Direct Investment Performance during Recent Financial Crises (2) and The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge related to comparison Inward and Outward U.S. Foreign Direct Investment Performance During Recent Financial Crises (3).
Your comments are focused only on FDI financial components that are included in all three papers. Paper 3 compares inward and outward FDI financial structure discussed separately in paper 1(inward US FDI) and paper 2 (outward US FDI). It would be totally wrong if the inward and outward US FDI equity and reinvested earnings quoted in above mentioned papers were different. The author used the same statistics based on the most reliable sources of the US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis to discuss financial structure of inward and outward US FDI. Please be informed that the scope and the character of inward and outward US FDI are different and require separate discussion and financial components cannot be missed.
There is no doubt that inward US FDI represents an integral part of the U.S. economy. The inward FDI constitutes important factor contributing to output growth, employment and export. The paper 1 examines inward FDI and spread out beyond financial structure of US FDI. It includes FDI flow and stock by geographical structure and comparator economies. It contains inward FDI stock and flow as a percentage of GDP and focuses on inward US FDI principal foreign affiliates, describes Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) and Greenfield investment.
The outward US FDI discussion includes US –based multinational corporations (MNCs), which have become one of the most powerful drivers of global economic expansion in recent decades. The paper 2 analyzes the outward US FDI stock contribution to the global FDI stock (comparator economies), includes the following analysis beyond the financial performance: geographical and sectoral distribution, outward US FDI corporate players (MNC’s) ranked by revenue and foreign assets, outward US FDI employment by industry and employment by corporate players. Analyzed issues are essential considering hesitation about the US-based MNC’s based on the assumption that they drain away capital, replace production of goods and exports of products that might be undertaken at US MNC’s at home. However, empirical study finds, that foreign activity of foreign affiliates of US corporations is associated with more production, greater employment, higher export and more R&D in the Unites States.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me personally.
Lucyna Kornecki

Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images