Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Scholarly Publishing Phishing Attempts Noted by Grecia


Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Cuidado com as revistas e editoras predadoras - Enago Brasil Blog

0
0

[…] proteger os pesquisadores de tais editores, foi criada uma lista de periódicos questionáveis que é atualizada todos os anos. É recomendado que pesquisadores, cientistas e acadêmicos evitem […]

Comment on Scholarly Publishing Phishing Attempts Noted by Jeffrey Beall

0
0

Interesting — this is a web design company, and it looks like they specialize in designing websites for predatory publishers! It’s possible the company owns all the “brands” of predatory publishers and the web design is a side business.

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Benno von Bormann

0
0

Dear Jeffrey,
I’m a retired Anesthesiological Prof. working as a scientific adviser in Asia. This part of the world has great potential, and is consequently in great need for publication, the more as acceptance by the established Journals is increasingly difficult to achieve. Your list is extremely helpful to avoid traps and pitfalls.
I didn’t find the following dubious(?) company on your list: SciMed Central. They catched me for the Editorial Board because I found some reputable names already in it. Strangely they changed from Herald Scholarly Open Access to SciMed Central. Sounds not convincing. The final hint is the submisson process: One file (word or PDF) to an Emailaddress. Can you confirm? I consider to cancel my cooperation. Thank’s in advance, Peter

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall

0
0
Sir, sorry for the confusion. I do have this publisher included on my list. It is listed as <strong>JScimed Central</strong>, so it is listed under "J". I agree it is dubious, and I do recommend that you not work with them.

Comment on Combining Fake Journals with Fake Conferences: Global Business & International Management Conference by ayo

0
0

i don’t think textraod journals is fake. I submitted a quality manuscript with the publisher, and after almost 3months of scrutiny (reveiw and corrections) my manuscript was accepted freed of charges.
So, i won’t wanna settle for textroad joournals being a fake publisher.

Comment on Combining Fake Journals with Fake Conferences: Global Business & International Management Conference by Jeffrey Beall

0
0

What is the title of your paper? I’d like to have a look at it, especially the copyediting.

Comment on Is the Editor of the Springer Journal Scientometrics indifferent to plagiarism? by The “sins and virtues of authors span a rather colorful palette”: New editor yanks plagiarized | Retraction Watch

0
0

[…] a research librarian and scourge of the predatory publishing world, had previously posted on his blog about his frustrations with the journal’s seeming indifference to the word theft. (He also […]


Comment on Is the Editor of the Springer Journal Scientometrics indifferent to plagiarism? by The “sins and virtues of authors span a rather colorful palette”: New editor yanks plagiarized – Nouvelles et satellite scientifique

0
0

[…] a research librarian and scourge of the predatory publishing world, had previously posted on his blog about his frustrations with the journal’s seeming indifference to the word theft. (He also helped […]

Comment on Is the Editor of the Springer Journal Scientometrics indifferent to plagiarism? by The “sins and virtues of authors span a rather colorful palette”: New editor yanks plagiarized paper – Nouvelles et satellite scientifique

0
0

[…] a research librarian and scourge of the predatory publishing world, had previously posted on his blog about his frustrations with the journal’s seeming indifference to the word theft. (He also helped […]

Comment on A Publisher with no Website: Science and Engineering Publishing Company by Amer

0
0

Could you please give your comments on Journals published by Serials Publications.

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Heru

0
0

Mr. Jeff…….
I am Heru from Indonesia…..
please give me several names of —–CLEAN JOURNALS, that publish the researches about INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Thank’s Sir.

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by wakhid jauhari

0
0

Could you tell me if the Advances in decision sciences and advances in operations research (Hindawi publisher) are good journals or a predatory journals

Comment on Scholarly Publishing Phishing Attempts Noted by bill

0
0

Iportal is certainly an interesting example of a response to an expanding market with a low entry barrier.

Comment on IDOSI Journals No Longer to be Indexed in Scopus by Muhammad

0
0

My opinion is different . Due to these IDOSI journals the Elsevier proceedia journals effecting. These journals have published conference proceedings at very low rate as compared to Elsevier proceedia. That’s why these journals delisted form Scopus.


Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall

0
0

I can tell you that the publisher Hindawi is not on my list.

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall

0
0

Sorry — I limit my work to warning people about questionable publishers. I cannot recommend the best journals in each field.

Comment on A Publisher with no Website: Science and Engineering Publishing Company by Jeffrey Beall

0
0

There are several publishers with that name. Can you send a link to the one you’re asking about?

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Dr khan

Comment on IDOSI Journals No Longer to be Indexed in Scopus by Farid

0
0

Mohammad

I have looked at World Applied Sciences journal, which has over 5000 articles indexed on Scopus. Just about 6 months ago, only one paper had more than 10 citations and it was criticized for publishing low quality articles on some Iranian websites. This journal was blacklisted by Iranian ministry of education preventing many people of publishing papers on this journal. All IDOSI journals were also delisted from ISC index.

Suddenly, in less than a few weeks, the number of citations for some of the papers on this journal was jumped to 39 on Scopus database. If one clicks on cite option on Scopus, he/she can easily understand that all citations come from another IDOSI journal. This is a simple manipulation of citation!

I believe the manager of IDOSI has been destroying other OA good quality publishers and creating an excuse for people like Beall to mix all good and bad OA publishers building a black list.

I agree with you that OA journals like “Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences” published by ELSEVIER are clear cases of predatory publishers where the editors don’t even bother to check the abstracts of the papers published and may be the reason behind Scopus team for deleting IDOSI papers from Scopus, but I do appreciate their actions against IDOSI for raising some awareness on scientific society so that other OA publishers care more about their publications.

I believe any manipulation of citation is bad not matter it happens from an OA publisher or from a good quality journal published by well known publisher.

Farid

Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images