Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Misleading Metrics by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

Yes, this one was added within the past 24 hours. Thanks.


Comment on About the Author by Arhiv bioloških nauka na listi predatorskih časopisa | Isparavanje!

$
0
0

[…] 12. juna stručni časopis Arhiv bioloških nauka nalazi se na Bilovoj listi “predatorskih časopisa“. Više o tome možete pročitati […]

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Tilahun

$
0
0

Any comment on International Journal of Insect Science, Journal of Entomology and Nematology, Journal of Applied Biosciences, and Biopesticides International?

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0
Regarding the <em>International Journal of Insect Science</em>, this is published by a company called Libertas Academica. This publisher is not on my list, but many find this to be a questionable publisher. Regarding the <em>Journal of Entomology and Nematology</em>, this is published by the Nigerian publisher Academic Journals, which is on my list, so I would generally advise people to seek a better entomology journal than this one. The <em>Journal of Applied Biosciences</em> is published by Elewa Biosciences, which is on my list. The journal <em>Biopesticides International</em> is not open access, so I haven't analyzed it.

Comment on A New Open-Access Scholarly Publisher and an Old Scam by Liz Levey

$
0
0

I just received a wonderful email, actually two of them. The subject line was unpublished manuscript and this was the text: “Greetings: SJP International Publisher invite you to publish your manuscript in our esteem journal. We accept manuscript from all areas of study. Regards, Editor (contactdesk7@wildblue.net). Send an email that reads “STOP”, to end this email.”

Comment on Science Publishing Group Publishes Junk Science by Dennis

$
0
0

I like how under “To cite this article” they misspelled the name of their own journal.

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by The antivaccination cult’s idea of what constitutes “peer-reviewed”| Skeptical Raptor's Blog

$
0
0

[…] does occasionally land on the list of “predatory publishers,” that is, a publisher who demands money to publish. Which Hindawi does for all of its […]

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by sylvanus

$
0
0

I do not understand how sciencedomain could be included in this list. this is because it me many months of correction and sending and resending before my paper was accepted. there must be something else being pursued. it difficult for me to accept.


Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by M. M. Khan

$
0
0

Dear Jeffry! Really a commendable work and very informative for researchers and contributors.
Can you share your analysis about IGI Global publishers:
http://www.igi-global.com
Thanks in advance!

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

IGI Global is not an open-access publisher, so I have not fully analyzed it.
Because it is not an OA publisher, it is not eligible for my list.

Comment on Fallout from Questionable Article in OA Pediatrics Journal by Susan Ariew

$
0
0

I warned one of my faculty off of publishing with SCIRP this morning. This blog post helped to explain why journals from SCIRP are not considered reputable OA journals.

Comment on Fallout from Questionable Article in OA Pediatrics Journal by Jeffrey Beall

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

I see that you have many, many articles published in this publisher’s journals. Perhaps it’s time for you to aim higher.

Comment on Publishing Pseudo-Science by Dr Zientehasta

$
0
0

You do realise the book you are questioning says “NEW THEORIES!!”

I suggest you go look up that word in your wiki…its retentive people like yourself that hold back science by only regurgitating the science of the past, new science is driven by THEORY, the science comes later…You sir are a fool!

Comment on Publishing Pseudo-Science by Dr Zientehasta

$
0
0

Religion was the birth of science, the birth of philosophy and the birth of many things. clearly you don’t understand that so you are not well placed to comment. all science study began with the question of the heavens and our origins and purpose, to not credit religion is like not crediting newton with current gravity theory because general theory takes president.


Comment on Serbian Journal Accepts Paper in 24 Hours with No Peer Review, Demands EUR 1785 by Enrico Marsili

$
0
0

Just for clarity. I agree that urgent publishing fee does not make sense. However, there are 1-2 case/year in my editor work (open access, VERY reputable hournal) when I got a manuscript from the publisher, send to the reviewer and get their response in less than 24 hours. Unfortunately (for the authors), such a rapid response is usually REJECT, for plagiarism or complete lack of novelty. I have never seen a paper accepted in less than 2-3 weeks (on Communication journals).

Comment on Serbian Journal Accepts Paper in 24 Hours with No Peer Review, Demands EUR 1785 by Zloupotreba jednog naučnog časopisa u Srbiji? | www.OMILJENA.net

$
0
0

[…] je „Arhiv bioloških nauka“, stručni časopis koji izdaje Srpsko biološko društvo, razotkriven kao predatorski naučni časopis – objavljuje radove bez stručne provere drugih naučnika, uz finansijku […]

Comment on LIST OF STANDALONE JOURNALS by How to Read and Understand a Scientific Paper: A Step-by-Step Guide for Non-Scientists | Jeffery Ross

$
0
0

[…] Also take note of the journal in which it’s published. Be cautious of articles from questionable journals, or sites like Natural News, that might resemble peer-reviewed scientific journals but […]

Comment on LIST OF STANDALONE JOURNALS by How to Read and Understand a Scientific Paper: A Step-by-Step Guide for Non-Scientists | Jeffery Ross

$
0
0

[…] Additionally pay attention to the journal by which it is revealed. Be cautious of articles from questionable journals, or websites like Natural News, which may resemble peer-reviewed scientific journals however […]

Comment on Serbian Journal Accepts Paper in 24 Hours with No Peer Review, Demands EUR 1785 by Petar Luković pod plaštom Superhika | Suština pasijansa™

$
0
0

[…] u tom slučaju praktično svi mediji pratili nove događaje. Konačno, pojavljuju se upravo danas vesti i o degutantnom slučaju našeg državnog časopisa za brzometne naučne radove, sa […]

Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images