Thanks. No, sorry. I limit my work to identifying low-quality and predatory publishers and journals.
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Raymond Anyanwu
Prof, Bell, please what about this journal. is it a strong journal? Journal of Teacher Education: jte@msu.edu
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Guido Berens
What is unethical about a “desk rejection” by the editor? As a reviewer, I don’t want to waste my time reading papers that have such obvious ‘fatal’ flaws that anyone can spot them within ten seconds. Likewise as an author, I don’t want to wait two months for a set of reviews just to be told that my paper doesn’t fit the scope of the journal. In my field (management), I believe the rate of desk rejections by top journals is increasing, and I think that is a good development. Of course some editors can abuse their power by desk-rejecting their rivals or enemies, but the author can then resubmit to another journal without wasting much time (provided that the rejection by the editor occurs quickly after submission).
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Happy
Is “Asia Pacific Management Review” a good journal?? It’s websit: http://apmr.management.ncku.edu.tw/
Thank you!
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Jeffrey Beall
I can’t find it. Can you send a link instead of an email address?
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Jeffrey Beall
It is not a predatory journal.
Comment on Two Predatory Publishers: One Old, One New by Hugo van den Berg
Scientia Ricerca is Lingua Latina Canina but not that dumb a name. I highly respect this blog and strongly recommend it to my students (I run a major PhD programme at a top UK university) so please do avoid such cheap shots and stay classy, Jeffrey.
Comment on Need Help Finding a Good Journal for Your Next Paper? Try These Resources by Need Help Finding a Good Journal for Your Next Paper? Try These Resources | behnamrastegari
[…] Sourced through Scoop.it from: scholarlyoa.com […]
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by MC
“Flavour” and other “our” forms are widely used in Canada.
Comment on Three New Open-Access Publishers — All with Dumb Names by MC
By that argument, they should not have used OAE, either, as it confuses with the much more widely accepted acronym for “Old Antarctic Explorer”
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Dr Deepak Batura
Dear Mr Beall,
This one appears quite dodgy as well. Did not find it on your list, though.
Comment on Three New Open-Access Publishers — All with Dumb Names by tekija
Some of the “journals” are actually hilarious. Like:
Journal of Unexplored Cancer Data
How can you publish anything in this journal, because after publishing it is no more unexplored.
Neurology and Nephrology Open Access
For neurologists with a keen interestt in kidneys. Certainly not a no brainer for nephrologists.
Open Access Journal of Opthalmology
It is REALLY difficult to get that one spelled correctly. By no means the only spelling error of MedLoose.
Artery Plus
Waiting eagerly for Vein Minus.
Comment on Three New Open-Access Publishers — All with Dumb Names by tekija
On a more sombre note, OAE claims.
“OAE has successfully launched four journals in the field of biomedicine with cooperation of the Asia-Pacific Association of Medical Research (APAMR), the Chinese Medical Association, the Italian Federation of Aesthetic Medicine, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). ”
EORTC is a large organization – the National Cancer Institute equivalent in Europe – so this is a bold claim.
On the EORTC site I can find nothing about any collaboration with OAE. I Thus doubt tis claim.
However, both of their cancer journals have an editor in Chief and an editorial board in place, which seem credible with full names an emails. Neither of these journals claims an EORTC affiliation though.
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by ferniglab
Indeed; it was difficult to think of an easy one here! I should have looked up Stan Carey’s blog, lots of better examples there!
Comment on Three New Open-Access Publishers — All with Dumb Names by wkdawson
“The publisher claims it’s based in Troy, Michigan. … It smells like OMICS International, …”
So now we have a “Trojan publisher”.
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Updated Gmail (and Google-based emails) filter against predatory publishers | Better Software Better Life
[…] I am receiving more and more emails from predatory publishers, so I have updated the filter which will send all the emails from those in the updated (2016) Beall’s list Beall’s list (2016) […]
Comment on Three New Open-Access Publishers — All with Dumb Names by herr doktor bimler
Comment on New Publisher Launches with Dozens of Grammatically Incorrect Journal Titles by Jeffrey Beall
I don’t know if it’s legitimate or not, but I can tell you that I do not want to add its publisher, the International Center for Scientific Research and Studies (ICSRS), to my list at this time.
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall
I agree. I have this journal’s publisher, Research India Publications (RIP), included on my list (as an exception, because it’s a subscription publisher that behaves like a predatory publisher).