Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on About Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review by Lalitha Pasam


Comment on About Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review by Dr. Abide taofeek olanrewaju

$
0
0

Dear Dr. J. Be all,
Thank you for your selfless investigative activity on academic criminals.
Could you oblige me in finding out if world journal of medicine and medical research is predatory? Though, it seems not to be on your list.
Regards
T.O.Ayinde

Comment on About Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

I can’t find it using Google either. Can you send a link to the journal? Thanks.

Comment on New Open-Access Publisher Has Great Graphics, Lousy Journals by Taghreed

Comment on New Open-Access Publisher Has Great Graphics, Lousy Journals by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

This journal is published by the so-called “Canadian Center of Science and Education” a fake center. I have this fake center included on my list. I recommend you find a better journal and publisher.

Comment on Publishing Pseudo-Science by Erika

$
0
0

Hello Sir, how is situation with European Journal of Science and Theology NOW – 2016 ? 6 issues per year. Write me your comments – current (please) .

Comment on Publishing Pseudo-Science by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

I don’t think publishing six issues in a year is necessarily a mark of quality.
For researchers thinking about submitting a work to this journal, I recommend they look elsewhere.

Comment on About Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review by Grace

$
0
0

I am not a med student, professor or researcher. I am just but an IT graduate who has worked for so many sites, non-profit organisations and NGOs as a writer, software developer, Editor, transcriptionist, VA, etc my list is endless.
I beg to differ with this post because I have worked for KEI Journals for over 1 year now and never did I experience any hidden or peculiar activities the journal is legit and I think it is wise of them to avail some info to subscribers only.


Comment on About Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review by Marco

$
0
0

I received the same message (different article title, of course) on June 30th of this year.

Comment on More Fringe Science from Borderline Publisher Frontiers by Oswald H

Comment on About Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review by tekija

Comment on About Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review by tekija

Comment on About Those Manipulative Spam Emails from Internal Medicine Review by herr doktor bimler

$
0
0

I see two links to PDFs there, one of them being the complete text.

Comment on More Fringe Science from Borderline Publisher Frontiers by wkdawson

$
0
0

The ol’ boy gets around…. in strange places.

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Fawole Ibrahim

$
0
0

Good day Dr. Beall,
Are these journals predatory?
1. Central European Journal of occupational and Environmental Medicine.
2. International Journal of Environmental Sciences (IJES)


Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0
Neither journal is on my list at this time. The <a href="http://www.ifnaworld.org/ojs/index.php/IJES/issue/archive" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">second one</a> appears to be a dead journal, having published only a single issue in 2013. I recommend avoiding it. Given the common title, it's possible we're talking about two different journals, however.

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Dr. Vincent Aduramigba

$
0
0

Dear Jeffrey,

Please help to verify the integrity of :
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research (IJSER)
http://www.ijser.org

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0
This journal is included on my <a href="https://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/" target="_blank">list</a>. Please do not send any papers to it.

Comment on Some Strange Goings On at Cureus by G Parker

$
0
0

The biggest problem with cureus is that the quality of the peer review is questionable. That is being worked on.

Comment on Some Strange Goings On at Cureus by Venkataramana Kandi

$
0
0

Editorial quality stands higher than peer review. A journal with better Editorial standard would certainly overcome a weakened peer review process. Having published significant number of papers in CUREUS, I guess the editorial quality of CUREUS is really outstanding.

My personal experience with CUREUS tells a lot about its publication procedure. My review paper which i submitted to CUREUS passed peer reviewer but failed at the editorial approval and was rejected with elaborate suggestions to improve the paper.

This journal definitely is not for people having the habit of professional misconduct.

Venkataramana Kandi (K V Ramana)PhD, FAGE
A/Prof of Microbiology
Member Asian Council for Science Editors (ASCE)
Prathima Inst. of Medical Sciences
Karimnagar-505417
Telangana
India
email: ramana_20021@rediffmail.com
Alternate emails: ramana20021@gmail.com
Mobile: 9440704234
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ramana_K_v?ev=hdr_xprf
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-6331-2010
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-0448
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/venkataramana-kandi/31/b60/94b

Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images