Dear sir/madam,
is International Institute of Science, Technology and Education (IISTE) a fake journal? please feed me with information. Thanks
Comment on Appeals by yon
Comment on Research by Jeffrey Beall
Is it a print only journal? I can’t find a website for it. If it is print only (that is, not open-access), then it’s out of scope for my work.
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall
This journal’s publisher, Dove Press, is not on my list at this time.
Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall
Comment on OA Megajournals Running Out of Unique Titles, Now Using Dumb Ones by Keith
Ultra Engineer? Isn’t that the new member of the Avengers?
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by mansour
Thx sir for your response.
I already published an article there, i just now read about the predatory journals and read your valuable list.this is the first article for me.
So, what i have to do now. Is it possible to withdrew my article ?
thank you again and best regards,
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall
It may be possible, but it’s probably more trouble than it’s worth, and it’s unlikely that another journal will accept an article previously published in a low-quality journal. So, just use it as a learning experience, and write a new and better article and submit it to a strong journal.
Comment on OA Megajournals Running Out of Unique Titles, Now Using Dumb Ones by Hugo van den Berg
Perhaps not so much a mistranslation as an idiomatic difference: the English that Indians speak with reasonable fluency among one another is larded with words that have a distinct, charming 1940s feel to speakers of “western” English: “the scoundrel absconded with my timepiece.” In British English, the sarcastic use of “precious” has all but eclipsed its original positive meaning (and yes, Gollum’s old-style use of the term sets him off as an oddball to modern audiences, even if it still had that value in Tolkien’s day).
Comment on Large, New OA Publishers Continue to Appear — Two Recent Examples by axinn
Juniper publishers
Publisher in Ontario, California
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by yeni widiawati
Dear Sir,
Could you suggest me about “Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A & Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B
USA” website of publisher :http://www.davidpublisher.com.
I frequently invited to publish paper in the journal by their editor. Are they including in Predatory journal ?
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall
Yes, I recommend you avoid all journals from David Publisher (also called David Publishing). They spam a lot. David Publishing is on my list. Please find a stronger publisher for your work.
Comment on Large, New OA Publishers Continue to Appear — Two Recent Examples by Jeffrey Beall
Comment on Misleading Metrics by Relawan Jurnal Indonesia Misleading Metrics - Relawan Jurnal Indonesia
[…] dan kredibel saja. Berikut data pengindeks yang “MENYESATKAN” menurut situsnya SCHOLARLYOA. Bagi para pengelola jurnal yang jurnalnya sudah menampilkan indeksasi ini, sara kami Relawan […]
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Rob
I have served as reviewer for a couple of paper submitted to Oncotarget in the last year. The papers were from people I didn’t know. I did my best to give my honest opinion and comments to them.
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Jeffrey Beall
Okay, did you recommend that either of the papers be rejected, only to see them published anyway still containing the flaws?
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Rod MacLeod
Hot off the press: we just had a paper rejected by Oncotarget. The reviewers said the work was scientifically sound and interesting enough but additional supporting clinical data were essential. In the rebuttal letter we, perhaps stubbornly, stuck to our guns and the paper was quickly rejected. In short, Oncotarget’s editorial behaviour was typical of other journals with comparable IFs which increasingly demand validation of lab findings by clinical studies. In conclusion, I would repeat that Oncotarget feels kosher and your criticisms unfounded.
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Jeffrey Beall
Wow, now you’ll have to submit it to a Frontiers or MDPI journal.
Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Rod MacLeod
FYI we have already submitted to another kosher journal with less clinical emphasis.