It seems so funny to me how their tactics ‘evolve’; the temptation is to say this is the cleverest one yet, however even the cleverest ones still have a fundamental stupidity to them that makes them laughable. In this case (as in so many cases) the whole thing is undone by their random selecting of a title of work that is totally unrelated to even the generalistic nature of the journal. Indeed l love the irony of the chosen work in your quoted spam, an article that is in fact about the pernicious impact of predatory publishing!
I laugh because I myself am regularly subject to these mails. I have yet to receive one of this specific nature (though l have such a gallows approach to this l actually look forward to eventually getting one!) but have just received a KEI one asking for a follow-up article in Medical Research Archives. I have never worked in the medical sector; my work is in fish parasites. But l have received countless emails from medical “journals” ranging from gynae to obstetrics to dental via radiology.
The juxtaposition of such an apparently sincere-sounding email and a totally irrelevant title is simply hilarious, but is also disheartening because you’d think it would convince everyone as to the scam nature of such journals, only for one to see that there are still so many who inexplicably defend them. Unbelievably l still have arguments with the odd academic who say things like it’s capitalism run amok, all this does is give large publishers monopoly, that small journals/publishers can’t get a break, that we’re racist because it seems so many of these are conveniently East or South Asian publishers etc. l am grateful that you take the time to explain, not only the nature of the perpetrators behind these schemes by painstakingly tracing their addresses and contacts, but also the nature of their scams- the blank contents, the page charges etc. l treat you as the default resource for checking any journal title l don’t recognise and thank you for doing the work that you do. Keep it up.