Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on David Publishing: Flipping Its Model by reka

$
0
0

Hi,
Thank you for the article, it was very useful. I thought I’ll answer their e-mail, to express my thoughts on their hilarious policy. Guees what… I got an answer from some Emma (? no family name…) Here it is, I don’t know, what to believe…

“Thank you for giving us the detailed thinking of our journal. I’m also very sorry to read the negative text on those websites. This is not the first time we know the links and we have to explain it again and again for our authors. As you can find out that, the texts just doubted why should we charge and whether our papers are peer reviewed. You know, as an academic journal, its readers are very limited. The subscription fee cannot afford its running. At the same time, there is no sponsor or any advertisement income for our journal. So we have to charge some fees to run our journal. Yes, the scientific knowledge is not a commodity, but the premise is that we have to maintain our livelihood. Please understand us and support us.

You can find the list of our editorial board members and reviewers on our website. All the papers submitted to our journal will undergo peer reviewing process. We have many reviewers and staff around the world, then we can finish the reviewing process more quickly than other journals. In other words, our company has been founded mostly 10 years and has published more than 40 journals, you can find them in some famous databases. If there is any problem, are all the authors cheated by us? Of course not. If you find more information, you can know that many academic journals in USA charge submission fee such as Chicago Journals. Maybe because our company is not so famous that some scholars cannot accept it.

For another, We have been contacting with ISI and SCOPUS for inclusion and have sent the copies of our journal to them, but there is no reply until now. Even though the Sociology Study has not been collected and indexed by the ISI and SCOPUS right now, but it does not mean it cannot be collected and indexed in the future. Anyway, it is also retrieved by some other famous databases such as EBSCO, CSA, Proquest, Ulrich, Summon and so on. And we will try our best to develop this journal better so as to be accepted by ISI, SCOPUS.

We will very appreciate if you could understand and support our work.

Sincerely,
Emma”


Comment on Publisher of Two Journals Sells “Best Paper” Awards by Suzena Marrela

$
0
0

Dear Beall,

I think you forgot to mention that http://www.ijobio.com/ is also index at your site as the last logo on right side named “individual journals” redirects to your site…………… :0) LOLZ. What a publisher!

Comment on Publisher of Two Journals Sells “Best Paper” Awards by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

Suzena,

Thanks for pointing that out! I did not realize that. Hilarious! There is a link to my site from this journal’s “Indexed in” list.

–Jeffrey

Comment on Publisher of Two Journals Sells “Best Paper” Awards by Lisa Di Valentino

$
0
0

The contact address for Maria Publications is 1241 Hamilton Street Eatonia, SK. So it’s Saskatchewan, not Hamilton, Ontario.

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2013 by Ijin

$
0
0

Any of you have an idea of the Germany-based Scholars’ Press? I have been sent an email from them in which they said they are interested in publishing my PhD dissertation. Now that they saw my work (very drafty one according to me) they renewed their intention to publish it, and they sent me the link to register saying that this “opportunity” is going to last only 15 days (7 days now). All this sounds suspicious to me and am not sure which moves to take. Any suggestions?

Comment on Bell Press Now on Beall’s List by Gerard Anonmyous

$
0
0

How do we get ‘em team? Should we send in a hit squad of European nerds to take them out? Blind them with laser pointers?

Comment on Publisher of Two Journals Sells “Best Paper” Awards by Reviewer

$
0
0

I sent an email to a couple of the people in the Editorial board. They did not know anything, of course.
This journal is seriously bad, although on the hilarious side…

Comment on Lambert Academic Publishing: A Must to Avoid by Robert Piche

$
0
0

A big problem with LAP is the excessively high price they charge for the books. Those who are interested in convenient self-publication of a thesis or textbook should consider some other publish-on-demand platform that allows the authors to set the selling price, e.g. CreateSpace.


Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2013 by Jeffrey Beall

Comment on New Health Care Journal Presents with Pathologies by Craig Boman

Comment on New Health Care Journal Presents with Pathologies by Craig Boman

Comment on New Health Care Journal Presents with Pathologies by Yurii

$
0
0

Dr. Morris Maduro is a real person in the U.California, Riverside. I wonder whether he is aware of being on this list

Comment on Appeals by chikumamu

$
0
0

thanks for the reply sir

please see JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES http://www.jemds.com/

i think its a predatory journal, the journal publishes articles almost every day.

thanks

Comment on New Health Care Journal Presents with Pathologies by Nils

$
0
0

So it appears Dr. Alabama Birmingham is missing from the Editorial Board.

Comment on New Health Care Journal Presents with Pathologies by midgardarts


Comment on New Health Care Journal Presents with Pathologies by Jurgen Ziesmann

Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

This publisher has a serious problem with transparency, among other things. The address it gives is bogus; this is a mail-forwarding service address and not its real headquarters address.

Comment on Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers (2nd edition) by Avoiding predatory publishers in open access publishing « Teaching and Learning Tips

$
0
0

[…] you protect yourself from predatory open access publishers?  Jeffrey Beall has made available a set of criteria you can use to determine whether a publisher is legitimate or predatory.    This can help you to […]

Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

Thanks for letting me know about this journal. I agree — they do publish many articles. However, after analyzing this journal, I do not find it to be a predatory journal. If you disagree, please let me know why. Thank you.

Comment on Predatory Publishing News by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

Thanks. It wasn’t meant as a jibe against Elsevier, though. Kind of the opposite.

Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images