This example clearly implicates that lack of credible peers, reviewing manuscripts prior to their acceptance, among predatory publishers.
↧
Channel:
Comments for Scholarly Open Access
X
Are you the publisher?
Claim or
contact us
about this channel.
X
0
Channel Details:
- Title: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
- Channel Number: 3627281
- Language: English
- Registered On: July 9, 2012, 7:52 pm
- Number of Articles: 10802
- Latest Snapshot: January 15, 2017, 7:06 am
- RSS URL: http://scholarlyoa.com/comments/feed
- Publisher: https://scholarlyoa.com
- Description: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing
- Catalog: //enrobe5.rssing.com/catalog.php?indx=3627281
Latest Images
7 clever tricks Primark does to keep you walking & buying more than you need...
July 20, 2025, 5:14 am
Art for Everyone! Autism advocacy, local stories, and indigenous pride in one...
July 20, 2025, 5:06 am
Paintings of English Downs 2
July 20, 2025, 4:30 am
How Kerala Women Rescued a Dying Forest and Turned It Into a Safe Haven for...
July 20, 2025, 3:30 am
Met Eireann warns of heavy rain & spot flooding for DAYS before big...
July 20, 2025, 1:14 am
Who is Kevin Lerena’s wife Geraldine?
July 20, 2025, 12:57 am
Man stabs woman, baby to death inside Queens home, police say
July 19, 2025, 11:00 pm
Ang papel ni whistleblower Julie Patidongan sa kaso ng mga nawawalang sabungero
July 19, 2025, 9:45 pm
Telangana Human Rights Commission (TGHRC) seeks report from revenue dept on...
July 19, 2025, 7:29 pm
Crisis-hit NHS fat cats raking in MASSIVE salaries as frontline services cry...
July 19, 2025, 2:11 pm
© 2025 //www.rssing.com