“…. the special issue editors ultimately submitted their conclusions in which they “doubt the continued, even accelerated, warming as claimed by the IPCC project” (Pattern Recogn. Phys., 1, 205–206, 2013)”. So what’s wrong in this statement? Are we back in Galileo’s times when doing research in cosmogenesis was considered heretical? The IPCC in its dogged defense of AGW is very similar to Cardinal Bellarmino: refusing evidence and pursuing skepticals at any cost.
↧