Hi, Margaret,
Thanks for the link correction. You may be right. I was convinced by the look and feel, the consistent and prominent display of bogus impact factors, pirated images, poor grammar, and the modus operandi, i.e., the hijacking. Also, I have seen many of the spam emails (thank you to those who forwarded me them), and they also bear a strong resemblance to each other.
I am not 100% sure that Tomas Publishing is the hijacker, but I merely wanted to report that much of the evidence points to them, and that’s one of the reasons I wrote the title as a question. If you have additional thoughts, please share them.
Thanks,
Jeffrey
