Comment on Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers (2nd edition) by Microsoft Adds Momentum to “Open Science”| Re/code

[…] Even among open access journals, a sharp divergence in quality is already becoming apparent. The Public Library for Science, BioMed Central and eLife have emerged among the serious brands in the space, offering their own prestige. Many others have been labeled predatory for charging researchers for the privilege of publication, among other questionable practices. […]