Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10802

Comment on Chinese Publisher MDPI Added to List of Questionable Publishers by Jina

I have just received an SMS message from a MDPI Editor to come to this forum and to defend MDPI.
So, I have just landed in this forum, but I will not speak like an under-control robot, but as a free human being.
I am human. I am scientist and I will speak with the language of TRUTH.

First of all almost all the defenders of MDPI in this forum are editors or authors with multiple papers in MDPI and they do not like to reveal the one and only one truth: MDPI is a Bogus publisher.

Second: MDPI has published many fake papers. Some of them have been reported by previous commentors in this forum.
I have counted more than 10 cases of bogus papers reported here. All well documented with many proofs and much evidence.

Third: If in the internet you can find 10 or 12 bogus papers accepted and published in MDPI, like those that combined genetics, philosophy and astrology in one paper, then we can easily conclude that MDPI probably has accepted and published more than 30 or 40 fake pseudopapers.
These articles and thousand other articles of low quality with made-up statistics (medicine, environment and sociology) is poisson of our academic life.

Stay far from MDPI bogus chinese enterprizes
P.S. I am also victim of the wild and aggressive MDPI spam


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10802

Trending Articles