I don’t really know how that’s relevant. I’m not a “big deal”. I’m just saying that critiquing the fanciness of some publisher’s office doesn’t seem relevant nor does it seem relevant that they have a Chinese person in a leadership role.
It sounds like there are enuf problems with this publisher for it to be avoided without these somewhat hallow critiques.
↧
Comment on Chinese Publisher MDPI Added to List of Questionable Publishers by sustainability person
↧