Jeff,
Yes I did read the article, and I think it was not peer-reviewed, otherwise it would not be accepted and published as a lot of commentators stated under the article.
Science and Nature publish kid and fiction story but they reject purposeful papers.
Nature and Science are here because of historical context that helped them (they are here since about 200 years ago), and they try to abuse of their positions.
They should be on a list comparable to the yours to invite people to boycott these journals and any other elitist journal.
There is already one indeed:
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals
Science is now on the open access road.
Is this for the sake of knowledge or money?
They should be ashamed if they have shame in their dictionary vocable, because they follow the example they was criticizing a while before.
They deserve to be added in your list but you will not dare to do it, will you?
Publication is becoming a corrupted industry.