Hi Robert J,
If MDPI is an “excellent publisher”, why was “peer review” in the case of its extraordinarily faulty Australian Paradox paper either non-existent, incompetent or ignored?
If MDPI is an excellent publisher, why does it not retract the obviously false high-profile “finding” that there is “an inverse relationship” between sugar consumption and obesity?
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/2014-02-09/5239418
I think you might agree that the authors’ own charts tend to point up not down: Figures 1-5 in http://www.australianparadox.com/pdf/GraphicEvidence.pdf
