I perfectly agree with Dan.
First of all, it can be agreed with that LAP is neither Oxford University Publishing, nor Harvard & Co. and we all know and we knew before signing the rights and conditions of the Agreeent with them that what it has been written is “original” (as well as that there won´t have been a peer – review). Now I would like to ask to the audience here: what does make a book to be a “good” one? to be published by Harvard & Co. just because they are worldwide known? Because of a peer-review? I wrote a book on EULEX – KOSOVO, and recently published with them, which I consider to be worth more than Oxford and Harvard University Press & Co. The issue of the peer – review I do not think is a guarantee against a worth – work. I mean, yes it can be a guarantee against plagiarsim in technical terms, but I am really sorry a TRUE WRITER and RESEARCHER like me would in NO WAY copy & paste!!!!! and so I think all the others like me as well would never do that!!! Additionally, in my last years I read books published by Oxford & co. by VERY KNOWN academics and I found not only grammar errors, orthographic errors and of style etc…but no really a contribution to KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH. Good Peer-Reviewed!!! SO WHAT? Please let´s avoid “clichés”. I have really enough of them. This world has too much of them.
