Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10802

Comment on New OA Publisher: the Council for Innovative Research by Vinoo Cameron

0
0

Science is free though, free from bias and other considerations. To some science has become a religion, some thing that promotes bigotry.. Let there be free thought, and let there be bounds on acedemia ( For 50 years they did garectomies and vagotomies for stomach acid, till one little fellow in Australia against the acedemia discovered helicobacter Jejuni, and for last 20 years , not a single such disabiling operation). Science is also one, there is no dicotomy. I did review a manuscript for this publisher written by a mathematician from IRAQ, and I reviewed it free from bias or other contraints, the author it seems was overboard in pleasing just western mathematics . That is not always true. WHAT I ASK CURRENT ACEDEMIA in relation to my published paper, is the precise angle subtended by a hypotenuse of the square root of 5 in the Pythagorian triangulation ( for 90 degrees it is 45 mathematical degrees). Current science is in error, should I not then have the freedom to correct this or do I have chains of acedemia?. Well this publisher( council for innovative research) is publishing my Paper after review( “Fixed points of the mathematical configuration of Mass and energy), or should we be in perpetual worship of the trigonometry of Sir Newton , and the theories of Sir Albert Einstein and be satisfied in getting to mars!!.Thank you for the civil discussion, and what is the subtended angle, any one?, read my paper when it comes out , or not read it , thats freedom.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 10802

Latest Images

Trending Articles





Latest Images