i agree that they are not doing anything blatantly wrong. but i do think that they misrepresent the impact of their publication and, most importantly, they lie when they suggest that they select the topics/scientists/papers by their high impact.
↧
Channel:
Comments for Scholarly Open Access
X
Are you the publisher?
Claim or
contact us
about this channel.
X
No ratings yet.
Channel Details:
- Title: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
- Channel Number: 3627281
- Language: English
- Registered On: July 9, 2012, 7:52 pm
- Number of Articles: 10802
- Latest Snapshot: January 15, 2017, 7:06 am
- RSS URL: http://scholarlyoa.com/comments/feed
- Publisher: https://scholarlyoa.com
- Description: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing
- Catalog: //enrobe5.rssing.com/catalog.php?indx=3627281
© 2025 //www.rssing.com