I already know that you are very experienced in what you are doing.
Please don’t take me wrong…
Out of curiosity…would it be possible that a budding publisher..or a standalone journal which is publishing with good scientific conduct…but lacks the capital to employ all up-to-date systems to process and archive and all..be enlisted as bogus here?
Only someone who’s published with them will know about their adherence to ethics.
Wouldn’t enlisting someone like that here be “unethical”?
Thanks
↧
Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by N.K. Gunasekara
↧