J. Beall said: “The publisher’s goal is to get the paper accepted as quickly as possible and pocket the article processing charges.”
One little “but”: peer review repot number 1 clearly states: “This issue of the journal is completely free of charge”.
I greatly appreciate the work mr. Beall does, but exactly this kind of oversimplifications may get us where mr. P Canning already is.
Great job done this time, though. About time to make peer review more transparent. Be it in OA or in TA journals.
