At least for mdpi, which I don’t represent- you should make an updated comment I think at the very least regarding why they are on your list.
http://oaspa.org/conclusions-from-oaspa-membership-committee-investigation-into-mdpi/
Or do you feel that OASPA’s investigation based on your own assertions is insufficient in it’s scope or conclusions? Have you discussed with OASPA?
I also have a paper in an mdpi journal special issue- which was guest edited by a pretty respectable scientist- and so I have experience their peer review and editorial review. It was actually pretty comparable to most of the more established Journals in which I have published.
