Dear Mr. Singh, the academic community struggles to understand how you were awarded a PhD with such views. The list of publishers are full of fraud (please spend some time on the pages of each) and the list of conditions looks like a 5-year old wrote the rules, full of nonsense and totally unquantifiable. I am wondering if you are linked to OAJPA in any way. If OAJPA is so transparent and “good”, then why do they not display the list of editors and selection board that makes decisions regarding which publishers are included on their list? If you are such a strong defendent of such a sloppily organized web-site full of grammatical errors and unquantifiable parameters, then why don’t you approach them to clarify these issues. Please ask the leader to come forth and explain the selection criteria…
↧