Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall
I have already included your publisher, Innovative Publication, on my list.
View ArticleComment on Google Scholar is Filled with Junk Science by Jeffrey Beall
The publisher Innovative Publication is already included on my list.
View ArticleComment on New Bottom-Feeding OA Journal: American Research Thoughts by...
Actually, this is a case of a hijacked journal. There is a legitimate Nautilus; this is the fake counterpart. I have it listed on my hijacked journals page here:...
View ArticleComment on An Open-Access Publisher You Can See Through: Pyrex Journals by...
[…] Why not name a publisher after Pyrex? […]
View ArticleComment on An Open-Access Publisher You Can See Through: Pyrex Journals by...
I am happy to see that Hindawi retracted the article. They made a mistake in accepting the article, but they fixed the mistake. Let’s move forward.
View ArticleComment on David Publishing: Flipping Its Model by alba
I have pubished times ago an article with david publishing, and I asked them to withdraw, but I just want to ask you why now that David is not open access it is still in your list? thanks! Alba
View ArticleComment on David Publishing: Flipping Its Model by Jeffrey Beall
This publisher occasionally switches it publishing model. Regardless of its model, I would like to warn scholars to avoid submitting papers to this very low quality publisher, so I am going to keep it...
View ArticleComment on OA Publisher Known for its Junk Science Has Chinese Language...
This publisher is included on my list <a href="http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and I recommend against submitting papers to its broad-scoped...
View ArticleComment on Google Scholar is Filled with Junk Science by Jeffrey Beall
Thanks — this is a helpful comment. I am sure you understand the point I am trying to make. Can you suggest a better way for me to express this idea?
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
This journal is included on my list <a href="http://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and I recommend against submitting papers to it.
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
Hindawi is not on my list. I cannot find the <em>Panafrican Journal of Medical Research</em> -- please send the link. The <em>African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and...
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
These journals are not on my list.
View ArticleComment on OMICS Publishing Group’s Abuse of Researchers: More Evidence by...
what about few other publishers; they do almost same strategies: sciepub/ global journal / dove press … and few others. if anyone have ideas about them. please kindly post here.
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Fernando Cardona
Dear Jeffrey Ball, why do you think that ccse is predatory? thank you in advance
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
I've documented some of the reasons in these two blog posts, <a href="http://scholarlyoa.com/2014/10/16/two-agriculture-journals-share-the-same-title/" target="_blank"...
View ArticleComment on OA Publisher Known for its Junk Science Has Chinese Language...
Dear sir, what can you say about the AYER journal (www.ayeronline.com/index.php/sjd). Thank you.
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by sayanti kundu
Respected sir,pls i want to know exact impact factor of the journal ‘International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)’ .
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
Zero. This journal does not have a legitimate impact factor. The one it has on its website is bogus.
View ArticleComment on OA Publisher Known for its Junk Science Has Chinese Language...
This journal is a complete mess. It does not claim to be open-access. It’s so bad, I don’t even want to include it on my list.
View ArticleComment on Google Scholar is Filled with Junk Science by perktj
The judgement of ‘junk science’ should be at the discretion of the reader to evaluate the methods and the evidence presented in front of them. I think it is a terrible idea that ‘’acceptable ideas’’...
View Article
