Comment on Other pages by Jeffrey Beall
Thanks for alerting me to this. It's a case of journal hijacking. I have added this case to my <a href="http://wp.me/P280Ch-z1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">list </a>of hijacked journals....
View ArticleComment on Dead Metrics by bill
Another relevant post: The ResearchGate Score: a good example of a bad metric http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/12/09/the-researchgate-score-a-good-example-of-a-bad-metric/
View ArticleComment on Other pages by Karthi
How do you say that the impact factor provided is completely fake? Given impact factor is true, That can be verified at the GIF webpage. Follow the link:...
View ArticleComment on Other pages by Jeffrey Beall
There's only a single product that calculates and publishes impact factors that's recognized internationally. It's called <em>Journal Citation Reports</em> (JCR), and its publisher is a...
View ArticleComment on Dead Metrics by AN
@Bill, I think Researchgate is among the most childish metric ever. I even do not see the usefulness of Researchgate itself, as a website. I asked them to remove my name many times but they did not do!...
View ArticleComment on Misleading Metrics by Mac
Can you throw some light on international journal of scientific and engineering research (www.ijser.org), plz?
View ArticleComment on Misleading Metrics by Jeffrey Beall
Because this journal is a black hole, I cannot shine any light on it. The journal is included on my list of questionable journals <a href="http://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/"...
View ArticleComment on Dead Metrics by jacek@amu.edu.pl
I can response only this way, as I am blind and must use special software. I cannot agree more; indeed, the point made by the author of criticisms against certain indexes should be even strengthened;...
View ArticleComment on Dead Metrics by Emma Friesen (@elfriesen)
Many journals, letters, etc in the IEEE suite report IF, Eigenfactor and Article Influence Score on their individual websites....
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Christian Marolt
These savant guys are spammers of high extent. Sending out almost daily emails without providing the email they have sent it to and asking for unsubscription. I have done it with an email they did not...
View ArticleComment on Dead Metrics by Dead Metrics | MEDCOMMSNEWS
[…] From Scholarly Open Access – [Read more] […]
View ArticleComment on Dead Metrics by kpmitton
Reblogged this on <a href="https://kenmitton.wordpress.com/2015/12/14/dead-metrics/" rel="nofollow">Ken Mitton, PhD FARVO</a>.
View ArticleComment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Andy
Dear Prof Beall; Please can you help verify me this conference. I received an invitation in my box and I don’t where it is coming from. http://nutrition-growth.kenes.com/ 3rd International Conference...
View ArticleComment on Two Publishers Both Publish Many of the Same Journals by Anthony A...
Your article regarding our journals is a bit misleading and borders on defamation. It is noted on the SEP website that DEStech Publications formed a partnership with the 20 journals to increase...
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by syed robayet ferdous
Dear Bell Let me know about the following publisher. My I publish my article by the publisher? Please help me. Scientific Research An Academic Publisher http://www.scirp.org/Index.aspx
View ArticleComment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
I recommend you NOT submit any papers to this publisher’s journals.
View ArticleComment on Two Publishers Both Publish Many of the Same Journals by Jeffrey...
I doubt your journals will ever be considered for an impact factor. I think your decision to collaborate with this Chinese publisher that uses the address of a big house in Indiana as its headquarters...
View ArticleComment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Jeffrey Beall
It’s really difficult to evaluate conferences like this one. I don’t see a scholarly society associated with this one, so it may be a for-profit conference. I would recommend extreme caution with any...
View ArticleComment on Two Publishers Both Publish Many of the Same Journals by Vijay...
Jeffrey, Deraco agrees that your article is only ‘a bit’ misleading. Obviously, he admits that it leads correctly for the most part. Deraco’s response is the natural reaction of the president of this...
View ArticleComment on Dead Metrics by Paula
I am curious about which ‘predatory’ journals are in SJR as I was under the impression that SCImago rankings are based on Scopus data. I know, from first hand experience, how thorough the Scopus...
View Article
