Thank you for you quick reply Jeffrey.
I have another question regarding IAFOR (http://iafor.org). I could not find them on our list either but I am not sure about them.
Thank you again.
FL
Comment on Appeals by FL
↧
↧
Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by NAG
Dear sir,
What about the journal IJAERS http://www.ijaers.com/ is it a good journal?
↧
Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall
This firm is not on my list at this time. I do regularly receive inquiries about it, though.
↧
Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
I’m traveling now and will check this journal as soon as I can after I return home. Thanks for your patience.
↧
Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Arun Krish
Dear Jeffrey Beall,
What is your take on Dove Press, New Zealand?
Looking forward hearing from you at the earliest possible.
Thanks!
↧
↧
Comment on Is SciELO a Publication Favela? by Pamela Graham
I have worked in the field of Latin American Studies Librarianship for over 20 years. I have followed both RedALyC and SciELO throughout my career. How are you substantiating the claim that most North American scholars do not know about these platforms? The systematic and careful development of metrics has been a strong achievement of these projects and that data suggests these platforms are indeed heavily used. Twenty years ago, there were no commercial publishers eagerly offering to “help” bring visibility to Latin American journals. These platforms and the larger OA movement that surrounds them have revolutionized journal publishing in Latin America, in my opinion, and I do not use “revolutionized” lightly. I know how challenging and difficult it was identify and source journals published in Latin America in the pre-SciELO days. In the last 20 years, common standards, procedures and access models have unified scholarly journal publishing within Latin America. This was done not only in service to the needs of U.S.–based scholars, but primarily to advance the growth of scholarly communities in many disciplines within Latin America. Among U.S.-based researchers and librarians in the field of Latin American Studies, recognition is high. I have organized sessions at the Latin American Studies Association (starting in the late 1990s, and up until this past May) featuring these projects. Name recognition of these projects isn’t really the point, however. If they are fostering better editorial standards, improved technical best practices, and support for greater visibility in other indexes and search environments, more researchers will discover the journals. More importantly, they will also be able to access what they find. Your “nice neighborhood” might be more accurately described as a gated community. Last time I was in Rio, I took a favela tour and saw up-close the complexity and conditions that reside in those environments. Lots of problems and challenges but also innovation, logic and creativity. Do we need a scholarly publishing favela tour to bring nuance and greater understanding to publishing environments beyond our literal and figurative borders?
↧
Comment on Is SciELO a Publication Favela? by Jeffrey Beall
Wow, an excessively self-referential and pedantic comment from someone who condescendingly visited a favela as a tourist. Where did your tour bus take you after the Favela?
↧
Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by NAG
okay, thank you for your response sir.
↧
Comment on Is SciELO a Publication Favela? by Anderson
Scientific Electronic Library Online. You can read more on: http://scielo.org/php/index.php?lang=en
↧
↧
Comment on Appeals by belguendouzr
Bonjour,I find this journal   in the list of Thomson reuters  “ ISSN (Imprimer):  2349-6800, ISSN (en ligne): 2320-7078, indexation:  zoologiques Records (Thomson Reuters), contacter No .:  + 91-9711224068. So,I think you’ve made a mistake,everyone can make mistakes,  because it is accepted in the list of Thomson reuters.  Therefore it is reliable, if you think not, how do you explain its indexing in Thomson Reuters? Thank youRachida
↧
Comment on Is SciELO a Publication Favela? by MRamos (@NativeLibrarian)
My apologies for the typos in my previous reply. Also, I should have included a link to SALALM (Seminar on the Acquisition of Latin American Library Materials) http://salalm.org/, a library professional organization that deals with this issue and much more.
↧
Comment on OMICS Publishing Group’s Abuse of Researchers: More Evidence by Carmen González
Hi everyone! I have been having the same problem. They ask me to pay a fee of 300. My question is… what happens if I refuse to pay? I am obviously not going to pay a single penny, neither to answer their emails, but I would like to know if there’s any consequence or any other solution better than ignoring them. Thanks a lot in advance!
↧
Comment on OMICS Group Now Charging for Article Withdrawals by simonbatterbury
The latest on OMICS – a broadcast all about their scams on ABC national radio in Australia (with a quote from Jeffrey Beall). http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/predatory-publishers-criticised-unethical-unprincipled-tactics/6656122#transcript. You should also be able to listen to the audio unless it is blocked to certain countries : http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/predatory-publishers-criticised-unethical-unprincipled-tactics/6656122
↧
↧
Comment on Appeals by LizR
Could you clarify whether Dove Press is or isn’t on your list? It was about 2 weeks ago and now seems to have disappeared.
↧
Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall
It’s not on the list.
↧
Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall
I cannot explain Thomson Reuters. I wish I could.
↧
Comment on Is SciELO a Publication Favela? by Mati
You’ve lost the important!
↧
↧
Comment on Is SciELO a Publication Favela? by Australia: ‘Bogus’ Scholarly Society Agrees to Publish Papers Without Peer Review | LJ INFOdocket
[…] Post on His (July 30, 2015): “Is SciELO a Publication Favela?” The post also mentions […]
↧
Comment on Publisher Uses Fake LinkedIn Identities to Attract Submissions by Alex
Hi Jeffery, I have seen your comments about MedCrave. Thats true, I worked for Medcrave for 5 months at Madhapur, Hyderabad. Due to Unethical business related to reviewer comments, i resigned from that company. B. Sudhip Reddy owns MedCrave Publishing Group
↧
Comment on A New Clone of OMICS Publishing Group: MedCrave by Alex
Hi Jeffery, I have seen your comments about MedCrave. Thats true, I worked for Medcrave for 5 months at Madhapur, Hyderabad. Due to Unethical business related to reviewer comments, i resigned from that company. B. Sudhip Reddy owns MedCrave Publishing Group
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
