Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on Company Offers Academic Ghostwriting Service by Sudesh

$
0
0

OK, I will modify my statement to read:

How is ghostwriting different from the scenario when an “individual” engages freelance content writers for his/her blog, takes the copyright from the writer and posts the content as his/her own? In digital marketing, with persons who are too busy to write content for their own blogs, this is very common.Even in music, fiction and non-fiction industry.

“While a natural or physical person earning an academic degree in his or her own name claims that his or her submission is the fruit of his or her own intellectual labor to prove his or her qualification.”

Here I think we need to make a distinction between thinking, planning and doing an experiment / study and the process of writing the paper. Thinking, planning and doing an experiment / study is the real fruit of “own intellectual labor” which proves his or her qualification. Writing is a one part of the whole process. Probably more papers are rejected due to poor study design than due to bad writing. If a person can thinking, plan and do an experiment / study; why not pay someone else to write it, if that person can not and he/she has the money to pay for it?

Ghost writing is frowned upon in medicine, when it is common in other fields, is probably due to its use by pharmaceutical companies to promote their products. But that is more of of a ghost-writer guest-write nexus.

The practice of writing papers is necessary, even essential for young scholars – as it is a LEARNING ACTIVITY (P Udoma above), and practice makes a man perfect. It needs knowing the study inside-out, creativity, clear concepts, which help in the long run.

It is interesting to note from Wikipedia – A 2009 New York Times article estimated that 11% of New England Journal of Medicine articles, 8% of JAMA, Lancet and PLoS Medicine articles, 5% of Annals of Internal Medicine articles and 2% of Nature Medicine were ghost written.

So, high profile authors, publishing in high profile journals use ghost writers!!!


Comment on David Publishing: Flipping Its Model by Yasmin Koppen

$
0
0

I was contacted today by this publisher and grew suspicious when they claimed interest in a paper that was about work in progress of a conference held three years ago.
I almost bit my keyboard when I read they a) want authors to contribute 4k-14k of words and b) charge them $50 _each_ page. Holy Moley! I mean, it’s nice that they are so blatant about their bullshit…

Comment on Appeals by genarojapos

$
0
0

Dear Jeffrey,

I require for delisting of Iamure since the journals are fully on subscription and not open access. The journals are subscribed by libraries of the top 200 universities.

Genaro V Japos

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Yann Le Corff

$
0
0

I’ve been to one of their conferences and one of my colleagues went to another of their conferences. Typically, there are two days of academic presentations/posters and two days of optional tours (included in the conference fees). The conferences are small (under 200 participants in my estimation). Presentations are very diverse (they accept presentation in all academic fields/disciplines), thus you will meet few researchers interested in the same field.

Conference proceedings are published in one of their open access online journals (International Journal of Arts and Sciences) at no addditional cost. You can also choose to submit a full lenght paper instead of an abstract, to be published as a regular article in one of their 5 open access journals, again at no extra cost (they make their money with the conference fees). I’ve co-authored (3rd author) a paper published in their Journal of Teaching and Education. The review process appeared “light” and it is certainly a near-zero impact journal.

So, I’m not sure if University Publications deserve to appear in the list of predatory journals. I don’t think we can call them predatory; they won’t try to rob you, sell your credit car info, or anything. I think they’re just very low impact journals ran by an organisation that are primarily interested in organizing conferences.

Comment on Bogus Journal Accepts Profanity-Laced Anti-Spam Paper by A cautionary tale for quants and systems traders | Humble Student of the Markets

$
0
0

[…] that the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology recently accepted for publication a paper titled “Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List,” whose text was nothing more than those seven words, repeated over and over for 10 pages. Two other […]

Comment on Appeals by Chacha

Comment on The Weaknesses of Journal Whitelists by Toma Buba

$
0
0

The biggest Disadvantage Whitelist journals is sentiment both at regional and country level.They accept article base on the ‘interest of their readers’, something that boost their Impact Factor. Against this, they will never accept article no matter the scientific soundness.

Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

It’s not a predatory journal. Good luck.


Comment on The Weaknesses of Journal Whitelists by Robert Cameron

$
0
0

The case for blacklists is surely strong, and Jeffrey’s regularly updated lists fulfill this function. I can see the point of criticising the ABDC list, but I wonder if going for the “easiest” journal in a subject list is not actually something to be encouraged. The waste of spirit and time caused by the pressure to go for only the very highest journals in terms of TR index is one of the great perversions of out time. In the end, researchers should be judged on the quality of THEIR work, and not by the shortcut of using the journals’ TR index as a surrogate. Good papers, accepted with less hassle in lower ranking but honest journals both gives those journals the chance to improve their TR ranking, and, crucially, helps to sustain a pluralistic publishing scene outside the rip-off artists of Predatory publishers. The dominance of a few giants is profoundly unhelpful.
Until work is judged on its particular merits, and not on the journal in which it is published, the scope for corruption will increase

Comment on Company Offers Academic Ghostwriting Service by OffHours

$
0
0

Sudesh, I wholeheartedly agree with the paragraph citing the importance of writing as learning activity for young scholars. To follow your thought, if any established scholar feels he has professionally grown far above that humble intellectual job of formulating his own thoughts and findings, isn’t it high time he started mentoring young scholars and, among other things, by giving them credit for reporting his research data, instead of forcing them to do it for free because they are dependent on him or instead of paying someone else for ghostwriting?

To credit your ghostwriter or your student as your co-author is the only honest way to go in relation to your readership. As a reader I expect everything to be correctly attributable. Otherwise, when one falsifies the authorship, the next step for him is to falsify the research data, then to fictionalize the whole research. The latter is hitting pretty close to home. Let me assume there is at least an assocciation between the widespread academic ghostwriting and plagiarism in our dear developing science and hacking of Western subscription journals in hope that the percent of garbage is lower there.

Digital marketing, fiction and non-fiction are three different beasts, science is a fourth one. I guess you do not reject George R. R. Martin’s writings on the basis of lacking a testable hypothesis and replicable results – these principles are alien to his genre; digital marketing and scientific research have different objectives and methods as well (who would have thought?)

Comment on The Weaknesses of Journal Whitelists by ‘Pátria desmatadora’ voltou a atacar nos três últimos meses de Dilma | Direto da Ciência

$
0
0

[…] The Weaknesses of Journal Whitelists Jeffrey Beall […]

Comment on Sci-Hub Will Increase Academic Plagiarism by Abdelmoumen Bacetti

$
0
0

What if your paper is plagiarized in the US or Europe, would this be different ????

Plagiarism is the same everywhere, it is a unified morality question not a nationalism question.

Comment on Sci-Hub Will Increase Academic Plagiarism by Abdelmoumen Bacetti

$
0
0

I don’t want accuse the author of this article, but from my opinion i support sci-hub because it makes things right.

The so called “publishers” make $$$$ by selling the work of researchers who spent time and money (money on equipment and money to be accepted in a conference and publishing fees !!!!!!!!).

The strangest thing is that those publishers own the copyright and sell researcher’s work to the universities.

Yes, those publishers spend time and money to put the works online, but the real owner of the research gets nothing.

Science hasn’t known dark and contradictory ages as these days.

The solution for predatory publishers is to inverse the direction of money in this industry. Researchers should ask publishers to pay them not the opposite. When this happens I will give the right to publishers to make money as well by selling my work and we will see all these predatory publishers disappear.

Comment on Sci-Hub Will Increase Academic Plagiarism by Abdelmoumen Bacetti

$
0
0

When I see someone stands by the side of publishers, I suspect he is representing one of them.

For me it is clear, all the publishers (even those whitelisted and open access) are predators because they charge researchers publishing fees to make $$$$$$$.

I support sci-hub and similars because the reality is that the scientific publishing entities are nothing but an industry worse than any other industry because it makes money using others efforts;

Comment on Misleading Metrics by Sylvester Fernandes

$
0
0

Can you please comment on Otolaryngology:Open Access
an OMICS publication


Comment on Misleading Metrics by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

I recommend that you NOT submit any papers to any OMICS journal.

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

In my opinion, this is a very low quality publisher. I recommend that you find a stronger one.

Comment on Misleading Metrics by Sylvester Fernandes

Comment on The Weaknesses of Journal Whitelists by CZpersi

$
0
0

“Dear author. Thank you for choosing our ‘History Journal’ as a venue for your research. However, your article is about ’History topic A’ and it would be better, if you would write something about ‘History topic B’ that would attract more readership base.” [Quote from an actual Editor’s response, only the topics and names were changed].

Comment on Questionable Subscription Publisher Acts Like a Predatory OA One by abamji

$
0
0

My message was similar, but with insufficient information for me to decide which of my articles was referred to. Before finding this site I looked at the journal website. There is a fascinating article in their July 2015 issue regarding John F Kennedy’s skull X-rays which repays scrutiny…

Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images