Comment on The “Open Research Network” Launches with 86 New OA Journals by Aleks Kleyn

From this post is not clear your point of view. In previous posts you usualy criticised such journals. But here text looks like you accepted it. However in the whole history through your different post one question appears. I can understand that when a lot of new journals appear such that it makes easier to publish new ideas is good. The ability of well established journals is limitted and volume of new research is growing, However I cannot understand what is good in new magazine if it just copy and paste existing papers and how such magazine can survive and be useful in future?