[…] Finally, I checked Beall`s List of questionable, scholarly open-access publishers. Yes, CMIL was on the list. The criteria for inclusion of publishers onto Beall`s List are available here. […]
Comment on Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers (2nd edition) by Due diligence when invited to join the editorial board of a new OA journal | Be openly accessible or be obscure
Comment on Hijacked Journals by Peter Raeth
Being invited at a personal level to submit a paper is an honor. However, I am quite put off by mass-mailed nagging. This is nothing more than spam. I do not take it to be from a legitimate publisher.
Comment on Canadian Sustainable Development Journal Doesn’t Appear Very Developed, or Sustainable by Samir Sharma
Here are the WHOIS infor:
Domain Name:ONTARIOINTERNATIONAL.ORG
Domain ID: D106462528-LROR
Creation Date: 2005-05-29T19:41:14Z
Updated Date: 2014-05-23T10:45:47Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2015-05-29T19:41:14Z
Sponsoring Registrar:Melbourne IT, Ltd (R52-LROR)
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 13
WHOIS Server:
Referral URL:
Domain Status: ok
Registrant ID:D111738389545671
Registrant Name:N Kurunduwa
Registrant Organization:Private Registration US
Registrant Street: PO Box 61359
Registrant City:Sunnyvale
Registrant State/Province:CA
Registrant Postal Code:94088
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.5105952002
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email:contact@myprivateregistration.com
Admin ID:D111738389545668
Admin Name:Admin PrivateRegContact
Admin Organization:Private Reg US
Admin Street: PO Box 61359
Admin City:Sunnyvale
Admin State/Province:CA
Admin Postal Code:94088
Admin Country:US
Admin Phone:+1.5105952002
Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Chris
Hi Jeffrey,
What’s your take on Environmental Sciences Europe (ESEU), the journal that republished the retracted Seralini paper without putting it through another review process.
Regards,
Chris
Comment on Other pages by Tom
Thank you very much for your reply. Well, I thought it was predatory because of its look (for instance, some pictures seem to be taken from Google) and its claim to be indexed by Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, DOAJ, Google Scholar, JournalSeek.
Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Homa
Dear Beall, Quest Journals Inc. is the questionable journal? or questionable publisher? thanks
Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
Its publisher, SpringerOpen, does not meet the criteria for being classed as predatory.
Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall
Yes, Quest Journals, Inc. is on my list.
Comment on Canadian Sustainable Development Journal Doesn’t Appear Very Developed, or Sustainable by Mahmood
Comment on Canadian Sustainable Development Journal Doesn’t Appear Very Developed, or Sustainable by Jeffrey Beall
It is published by Academic Journals, and this publisher is on my list. I recommend that you not submit any articles to this publisher’s journals.
Comment on Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers (2nd edition) by Dana Stazi Bentchik
Dear Mr Beall,
Thank you for this valuable information. I have been approached by a few wannabe publishers, even almost believed one email, but always got somehow discouraged by the sender’s conduct of the English language, not even getting to the fee issue.
This is really a very helpful list and I am passing it to all my colleagues.
Thanks again for caring.
Comment on Canadian Sustainable Development Journal Doesn’t Appear Very Developed, or Sustainable by Mahmood
Sure please. It is also on my list. But still, can you tell it status as being SCI indexed or not.
http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlchange.cgi?Full=Scientific+Research+and+Essays
What does it mean that its Reactivated as per the links above?
Comment on Canadian Sustainable Development Journal Doesn’t Appear Very Developed, or Sustainable by Jeffrey Beall
See here: http://wokinfo.com/publisher_relations/journals/
It says, “Many factors are taken into account when evaluating journals for coverage in Web of Science Core Collection … ” so I assume reactivated means was removed from coverage and then got included again.
Comment on Peer Review Reports from Questionable Publishers: Three Examples by P Canning
We should submit papers only to publishers like Elsevier and others who do a good job of adding value to papers. Open access journals are too much headache. Not one is good, lot of predators are there and charges are in thousands of dollars. Should be avoided.
Comment on Peer Review Reports from Questionable Publishers: Three Examples by Koushik Pal
The predatory publishers remind me of thugs who once created havoc in India. The British rulers brought their terror to an end after prolonged attempts. We need such operations. Mark and catch and hang them! Metaphorically speaking…
Comment on Peer Review Reports from Questionable Publishers: Three Examples by M. M. Khan
I totally agree with what you have commented about young researchers.
Comment on Appeals by Pablo J SAEZ
Dear Mr Beall, I appreciate your effort to improve the publishing practice.
Have you check “Ivy Union Publishing”? (http://ivyunion.org/index.php/index/index)
Best regards,
PJS
Comment on Appeals by Jeffrey Beall
Comment on Peer Review Reports from Questionable Publishers: Three Examples by L. S.
I want that paper too!!!!
Comment on Peer Review Reports from Questionable Publishers: Three Examples by Jeffrey Beall
I personally would avoid their journals and conferences. I would advise my friends to avoid them also. They are more like vacation packages than conferences, in my opinion. I recommend that you seek a more authentic conference venue, such as one organized by a real scholarly society.