Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Scholarly Open Access
Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment on “No Author Fee” Open-Access Journal Bills Author for His Accepted Paper by Sun Huh

$
0
0

I found the article in Scholarly Open Access at https://scholarlyoa.com/?s=Annals+of+Rehabilitation+Medicine.
In this article, Annals of rehabilitation medicine (ARM) was treated as a predatory journal. I contacted editor, Dr. Jung. She told me that it was a wrong announcement in the homepage. After I informed her, the content was fixed as below immediately:

[Minimum page charges and additional fees for reprints will be due for every manuscript. Costs for printing color illustrations are charged to the authors regardless of a member or a non-member. All published manuscripts become the permanent property of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine and may not be published elsewhere without written permission.
Page charges – The Society depends on the payment of page charges to offset the cost of publication. Payment of 10,000 Korean won/page is required.
Open access – Charges to make articles open access are free.
Color charges – Color figures in print cost 15,000 Korean won and black and white figures in print cost 10,000 Korean won each. Color print charges are 150,000 Korean won per every 16th printed page. Authors may opt to have figures printed in black and white but produced in color online. If the author elects to have online color figures, the author will be additionally charged 5,000 Korean won per figure.
Manuscript editing charges – Manuscript editing charge is 150,000 Korean won per article.
Additional charges – Authors can be charged for paper offprints and delivery if necessary.]

ARM is not unprofessional and exploitative publication journal that Indian author mentioned. It is the official journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. It is also indexed in PMC/PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1767/), and SCOPUS, KoreaMed, KoreaMed Synapse. It launched from 1977. I have consulted editors of ARM since 2010. Editors are all volunteers for official journals of the society. They did not receive any honorarium. APC was only used for the editing and publishing. Cost is reasonable: about 100 US dollars per page. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine is the executive board society of the Korean Academy of Medical Science, the official organization of all medical societies in Korea. It is also member journal of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (http://kamje.kr). Dr. Bang, editor and Dr. Jung, associate editor are top-notch physicians and researchers in Korea. They are all faculties of Seoul National University College of Medicine, leading medical school in Korea.

I heard that Indian author did not pay the APC: therefore, the article was not published. If it is real unprofessional and exploitative publication journal, why so many authors in Korea and abroad publish their articles form ARM? This society never want to earn money. Most of publishing cost were also provided by the society. APC US 100 per page is not enough cost for publishing one article as you know. No editors in Korea receive the honorarium during their editor job. No medical journals from Korea are published by commercial companies. Therefore there is no predatory medical journal in Korea. Of course, there is no predatory scholarly journal in all fields in Korea. All journals are evaluated by National Research Foundation for their quality and timeliness. All medical journals from Korea have been published by scholarly societies or no-profit organization and most of them were supported by the Government. ARM was also supported by Korean Government through the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies.

My carelessness caused this affair. I asked editors to add submenu on APC in the journal web site. At time, I gave the routine announcement format that was used by many medical journals in Korea. For example,

[There is no author’s submission fee or other publication related fee since every cost for the publication process is supported by the publisher; therefore it is the so-called platinum open access journal]

It is my mistake not to confirm the APC of ARM exactly. Many medical journals do not receive any APC. For example, http://jeehp.org, http://e-epih.org, http://kjme.kr, and http://e-eht.org/. Above announcement was dispatched to company that worked for journal homepage and uploaded without the confirmation by editor.

Sun


Comment on Two New Absurd OA Journals, Two New OA Mandates by SM

$
0
0

If I’m not mistaken, aren’t some universities adopting open access policies in order to enable deposition of articles from print journals into repositories after an embargo period? (Not necessarily just to force people to only submit to OA journals.) I think work funded by certain US agencies already has that ability for deposition of work put into (some?) subscription journals, but work not funded by those agencies could be depositable based on certain journals’ policies IF the institution has a policy requiring open access. My school has an OA mandate that can be opted out of quite simply, but that I think is there to facilitate deposition into public repositories.

Comment on Two New Absurd OA Journals, Two New OA Mandates by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

I find it highly questionable. I think this publisher meets the criteria for inclusion on my list, so I’ve added it. Thanks for alerting me to it. Most definitely, don’t send any of your work to any of their journals. It appears they created a pretend scholarly society for each of their journals.

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Raymond Anyanwu

$
0
0

Well done Mr Jeff. I am highly impressed by this selfless service. Please i would like to know if sciepub.com, IOSR journal, Int’l Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education and Academy journals. PLS how genuine are they?

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Tia AR

Comment on List of Predatory Publishers 2014 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0
This journal is included on my list <a href="https://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I recommend that you not send any papers to this journal.

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0
The following publishers are all included on my list <a href="https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>: sciepub.com = Science and Education Publishing (Scipub) IOSR Journal = International Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR Journals) Academy Journals I strongly recommend that researchers <strong>not</strong> send papers to any journals from these publishers. I cannot find any reference to an <em>International Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education</em>, so you'll need to forward me a link to it.

Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by bronsen

$
0
0

the supposedly redacted link only says “oncotarget.msub” but still points to the paper in question.


Comment on OA Publisher to Peer Reviewer: Never Mind by Vince DeBari

$
0
0

Here’s the text of a reply I sent to a journal a couple of months ago. I believe it’s self-explanatory:

“You sent the invitation at 1:04 am and told me that my services were no longer required at 6:00 am. As I cannot stay up all night waiting for requests to review for your journal, please don’t bother me again.”

Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Yurii

$
0
0

Can’t say about editor’s buddies. I recomended this journal twice – in 2013 and in 2014. I think Oncotarget does not or at least did not have much of a pre-review screening – they sent either everything or close to everything to reviewers. To me that was the major selling point of this journal – I have a thing about editorial rejections. In both cases the manuscripts were reviewed. One of those manuscripts was rejected with three reviews that made sense. The other was accepted but the reviewers asked for a numbers of changes and additional experimetns. Based on this experience (N=2) I did not feel that these reviews were in any way compromised. I cannot obviously say that about 100% of submited manuscripts but, frankly, I don’t think that that the evidence presneted in the original post (n=1) are strong enough to make this claim either.

Comment on OA Publisher to Peer Reviewer: Never Mind by Frank Lu

$
0
0

Neat! A little poem like this may actually get published.

Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Leonid Schneider

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Khalid EL BAIRI

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 by Jeffrey Beall

Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Mikhail Blagosklonny

$
0
0

All papers are reviewed by 3-7 reviewers. I do not know any journals with more peer-reviews than Oncotarget, although I served on 15 Journals as Editorial Board Member. The only papers that were reviewed more freely are from the University of Colorado. Because you put a pressure on us, the only University we were eager to be positive more than necessary was your University. However, we agree to reconsider and review all papers from Colorado University again. Because we do not know any other Universities with special treatment. If you think that the reviews were not strong enough, it might be applied only to the University of Colorado, where two reviewers instead of 3-7 were sufficient to make a decision for the Editorial Board. If you wish, we can reconsider all these publications upon your request.

Please make this comment public


Comment on Oncotarget’s Peer Review is Highly Questionable by Guido

$
0
0

Honestly in my experience I can say that, at least, oncotarget send all the manuscripts out for review… it is surely more ethical than an initial rejection based on a simple look by a single editor… Moreover, the reviewers raised reasonable points and went through the manuscripts very carefully… Thus I can’t support the criticisms to the journal

Comment on Lambert Academic Publishing: A Must to Avoid by Bishnu

$
0
0

Are you Indian guys born in USA now? Nowadays, lots of Indians are educated in USA. Does that mean they are born in USA or they are educated in USA? How can you try to fool the people by saying Buddha was born in India. It is true that Buddha was enlighten in India. That does not mean he was born in India. So, do not try to lie our Indian brothers. Why do you be defamed further by telling the lies. Why not straightly say the truth. The truth is that he was born in Nepal and he was enlighten in India. That’s all. Try to live with the truth and do not try to lie as per your convenience.

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Trish Paton (@trishpaton)

$
0
0

Can I just say, Jeffrey, thank you so much for pulling these lists together. I can imagine how much work it is to keep up with what is obviously an ever-expanding list.

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Achukwu Chimezie B

$
0
0

Dear Beall, thanks for the good work you are doing by enlightening with information on what to look out for when choosing a journal or publisher for our articles. But how can i find journals that are not predatory for my publications? Do you have a list for non-predatory Journals and Publishers?

Comment on Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2016 by Jeffrey Beall

$
0
0

Thanks. I will have a look at this journal.

Viewing all 10802 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images